Microsoft Copilot vs Google Duet AI vs Amazon Q: Enterprise Comparison 2025

Enterprise AI assistants are no longer a future consideration---they are a current procurement decision. Microsoft Copilot, Google Duet AI (now Gemini for Workspace), and Amazon Q represent the three major platform plays for enterprise AI productivity. Each is deeply integrated with its parent ecosystem, each claims transformative productivity gains, and each has fundamentally different architectures, security models, and compliance capabilities.

This is not a feature checklist comparison. Feature parity shifts quarterly as each vendor ships updates. This is a strategic analysis of how each platform serves enterprise requirements: integration depth, security architecture, compliance readiness, total cost of ownership, and organizational fit. The goal is to give enterprise decision-makers---CTOs, CIOs, Chief AI Officers---the framework to make a defensible procurement decision.

Platform Overview

Microsoft Copilot (Microsoft 365 Copilot)

Foundation: Built on OpenAI's GPT-4 models, integrated across the entire Microsoft 365 ecosystem (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive) plus Dynamics 365 and Power Platform.

Data Source: Microsoft Graph---the unified API that connects all Microsoft 365 data: emails, documents, calendar events, chat messages, meeting transcripts, SharePoint content, and organizational directory information.

Architecture: Copilot queries the Microsoft Graph for relevant content, assembles it into a context window, and generates responses using GPT-4. All processing occurs within the Microsoft 365 trust boundary. Microsoft states that customer data is not used to train foundation models.

Target Market: Organizations with deep Microsoft 365 investments, particularly those in regulated industries requiring enterprise-grade compliance capabilities.

Google Gemini for Workspace (formerly Duet AI)

Foundation: Built on Google's Gemini models (Gemini 1.5 Pro and Ultra), integrated across Google Workspace (Gmail, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Meet, Chat, Drive).

Data Source: Google Workspace data---emails, documents, spreadsheets, presentations, calendar events, and Drive content. Integration with Google Cloud services (BigQuery, Vertex AI) available for advanced scenarios.

Architecture: Gemini processes queries using Google's infrastructure with context from the user's Workspace data. Google's Workspace AI operates within the Workspace trust boundary with data residency options.

Target Market: Organizations standardized on Google Workspace, particularly technology companies, digital-native businesses, and organizations prioritizing cloud-native architecture.

Amazon Q (formerly Amazon CodeWhisperer + Q Business)

Foundation: Built on Amazon's Bedrock foundation models (including Anthropic Claude, Amazon Titan, and others), available as Q Business (enterprise knowledge assistant) and Q Developer (code generation).

Data Source: Connects to 40+ enterprise data sources via connectors: Amazon S3, RDS, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Jira, Confluence, SharePoint, and more. Q Business is data-source agnostic---it can index content from multiple platforms simultaneously.

Architecture: Q Business uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with enterprise data sources. Customers choose which foundation model to use. All processing occurs within the customer's AWS account with full data isolation.

Target Market: Organizations with significant AWS investments, multi-platform environments, and those requiring data-source flexibility and model choice.

Feature Comparison: Enterprise Productivity

Document Creation and Editing

Microsoft Copilot:

• Draft documents in Word from prompts, reference documents, or meeting notes
• Rewrite, expand, shorten, and adjust tone of existing content
• Generate presentations in PowerPoint from Word documents or prompts
• Create complex Excel formulas and data analysis using natural language
• Deep integration means Copilot understands document context, formatting, and organizational templates
• Strength: Unmatched depth across Office applications---Copilot operates within Word, not alongside it

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Draft and edit content in Google Docs
• Generate presentations in Google Slides
• Create formulas and analysis in Google Sheets
• "Help me write" feature across Gmail, Docs, and Slides
• Image generation capabilities in Slides
• Strength: Native cloud architecture with real-time collaboration baked into every AI interaction

Amazon Q Business:

• Generates answers and summaries from enterprise data sources
• Creates content based on indexed organizational knowledge
• Does not directly integrate with document editors (Word, Docs)
• Operates as a standalone assistant or embedded in AWS applications
• Strength: Can synthesize information across multiple platforms (SharePoint + Salesforce + Confluence) in a single query

Email and Communication

Microsoft Copilot:

• Draft, reply, summarize, and prioritize emails in Outlook
• Coaching feature for email tone and clarity
• Thread summarization for long email chains
• Integration with Teams for unified communication intelligence
• Depth: Copilot understands email threads, calendar context, and organizational relationships

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Draft and reply in Gmail
• Email summarization and prioritization
• Smart compose and contextual suggestions
• Integration with Google Chat for unified messaging
• Depth: Strong summarization and multi-language support

Amazon Q Business:

• Can search and reference email content (via connectors)
• Does not directly compose or reply to emails
• Focuses on knowledge retrieval rather than communication productivity
• Depth: Limited email productivity; strengths are elsewhere

Meeting Intelligence

Microsoft Copilot:

• Real-time meeting transcription and summarization in Teams
• Action item extraction with owner assignment
• Post-meeting recap with topic segmentation
• "Catch me up" feature for late joiners
• Channel summarization in Teams
• Depth: The most comprehensive meeting intelligence of the three platforms

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Meeting notes and transcription in Google Meet
• Meeting summarization and action item extraction
• "Take notes for me" feature during meetings
• Available in Google Meet only (not third-party meeting platforms)
• Depth: Strong basic meeting intelligence; less advanced than Teams Copilot

Amazon Q Business:

• Can index and search meeting transcripts (if stored in connected data sources)
• Does not provide real-time meeting intelligence
• No native meeting platform integration
• Depth: Not a meeting intelligence tool

Data Analysis

Microsoft Copilot:

• Natural language data analysis in Excel
• Python in Excel integration (Wave 2) for advanced analytics
• Power BI Copilot for business intelligence queries
• Fabric integration for enterprise data platform analysis
• Depth: Strongest data analysis across desktop (Excel) and enterprise (Power BI/Fabric)

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Natural language data analysis in Google Sheets
• BigQuery integration for large-scale data analysis
• Vertex AI integration for machine learning workflows
• Looker integration for business intelligence
• Depth: Strong cloud-native analytics; requires Google Cloud commitment for advanced scenarios

Amazon Q Business:

• Can query and analyze data from connected databases (RDS, Redshift, S3)
• Q in QuickSight for business intelligence queries
• Bedrock integration for custom ML workflows
• Depth: Strongest for multi-source data federation; requires AWS investment

Security Architecture Comparison

Security is the decisive factor for enterprise AI procurement. The three platforms have fundamentally different security architectures.

Data Isolation and Processing

Microsoft Copilot:

• All processing within Microsoft 365 trust boundary
• Customer data stays within tenant boundary
• Microsoft commits that customer data is not used to train foundation models
• Data residency options for EU, US, and other regions
• Compliant with Microsoft's existing DPA (Data Processing Addendum)

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Processing within Google Workspace trust boundary
• Customer data not used to train Gemini models (enterprise commitment)
• Data residency available through Google Workspace data regions
• Compliant with Google Cloud's DPA
• AI Processing Agreement available for additional assurance

Amazon Q Business:

• All processing within customer's AWS account
• Customer maintains full control over data storage and processing
• Foundation model selection allows choosing models with preferred data policies
• VPC integration for network isolation
• Customer manages encryption keys (KMS)
• Advantage: Strongest data isolation---customer controls the infrastructure

Access Control and Authentication

Microsoft Copilot:

• Entra ID (Azure AD) authentication
• Conditional access policies
• Sensitivity labels with encryption enforcement
• Information barriers
• Privileged access management integration
• Advantage: Deepest integration with enterprise identity infrastructure (for Microsoft shops)

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Google Workspace identity with SSO (SAML/OIDC)
• Context-aware access policies
• Google DLP integration
• Drive sharing restrictions
• BeyondCorp Enterprise integration
• Advantage: Strong cloud-native zero-trust model

Amazon Q Business:

• IAM integration with fine-grained permissions
• Identity federation (SAML, OIDC)
• Document-level access control respecting source system permissions
• VPC endpoint for private connectivity
• Advantage: Most flexible identity integration for multi-platform environments

Data Loss Prevention

Microsoft Copilot:

• Microsoft Purview DLP with 300+ sensitive information types
• Real-time DLP enforcement on Copilot interactions
• DLP policies span all Microsoft 365 locations
• Communication compliance for content monitoring
• Maturity: Most mature enterprise DLP integration

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Google DLP with predefined and custom detectors
• DLP rules for Drive, Chat, and Chrome
• Integration with Google Cloud DLP for advanced scenarios
• Maturity: Strong but fewer predefined sensitive information types than Purview

Amazon Q Business:

• Relies on source system DLP (e.g., SharePoint DLP for SharePoint-connected content)
• Guardrails for content filtering and PII redaction
• Customer-managed access controls limit what Q can retrieve
• Maturity: Emerging; depends on source system controls

Compliance Readiness Comparison

Certifications and Attestations

| Compliance Standard | Microsoft Copilot | Google Gemini | Amazon Q | |---|---|---|---| | SOC 2 Type II | Yes | Yes | Yes | | ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes | Yes | | HIPAA (with BAA) | Yes | Yes | Yes | | FedRAMP High | Yes (GCC High) | Yes (Google Public Sector) | Yes (GovCloud) | | GDPR | Yes | Yes | Yes | | PCI DSS | Partial (scope-dependent) | Partial | Partial | | StateRAMP | Yes | Emerging | Yes | | ITAR | Yes (GCC High) | Limited | Yes (GovCloud) | | CJIS | Yes (GCC High) | Limited | Yes (GovCloud) |

Government and Regulated Industry Readiness

Microsoft Copilot:

• GCC, GCC High, and DoD environments available
• Longest track record in federal government deployments
• Most extensive compliance documentation
• Advantage: Widest government compliance coverage

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Google Public Sector with FedRAMP authorization
• Growing federal footprint but smaller installed base
• Strong IL4/IL5 capabilities in Assured Workloads
• Advantage: Cloud-native compliance architecture

Amazon Q Business:

• AWS GovCloud with FedRAMP High authorization
• Strong federal presence through AWS government contracts
• Most flexible for custom compliance configurations
• Advantage: Customer controls infrastructure, enabling custom compliance configurations

Audit and eDiscovery

Microsoft Copilot:

• Purview Audit (Standard and Premium) captures all Copilot interactions
• Purview eDiscovery includes Copilot-generated content
• Retention policies apply to Copilot data
• Legal holds cover Copilot content
• Maturity: Most mature audit and eDiscovery for AI interactions

Google Gemini for Workspace:

• Google Vault for eDiscovery (covers Gemini interactions in Workspace)
• Audit logs via Google Workspace Admin Console
• Retention rules apply to Gemini-generated content
• Maturity: Solid but less granular than Purview for AI-specific events

Amazon Q Business:

• CloudTrail logging for all Q interactions
• Customer manages audit log retention in S3/CloudWatch
• eDiscovery depends on customer's chosen tools (no native eDiscovery)
• Maturity: Requires customer to build eDiscovery workflows

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

Licensing Costs (Per User Per Month)

| Component | Microsoft Copilot | Google Gemini | Amazon Q | |---|---|---|---| | AI Assistant License | $30 | $30 (Gemini Business) / $35 (Gemini Enterprise) | $20 (Q Business) | | Base Productivity Suite | $36 (E3) / $57 (E5) | $14 (Business Standard) / $25 (Business Plus) | N/A (no productivity suite) | | Total per User | $66 - $87 | $44 - $60 | $20 + existing suite cost |

Hidden Cost Factors

Microsoft Copilot Hidden Costs:

• SharePoint permission remediation: $50K-$200K (one-time)
• Sensitivity label implementation: $30K-$100K (one-time)
• Training and change management: $50K-$150K
• Ongoing governance administration: $80K-$150K/year
• Purview Premium for advanced compliance: $12/user/month additional

Google Gemini Hidden Costs:

• Google Workspace migration (if not already on Workspace): $200K-$1M+
• DLP and compliance configuration: $30K-$80K
• Training for organizations transitioning from Microsoft: $100K-$300K
• Integration development for non-Google data sources: Variable

Amazon Q Hidden Costs:

• Connector configuration and maintenance: $50K-$150K
• Custom RAG pipeline development: $100K-$300K
• No native productivity suite (must maintain separate Office/Workspace licenses)
• Infrastructure costs (compute, storage, networking): Variable
• Specialized AWS expertise required: Premium talent costs

3-Year TCO for 5,000 Users

| Cost Category | Microsoft Copilot (E5) | Google Gemini (Enterprise) | Amazon Q + Microsoft 365 E3 | |---|---|---|---| | Licenses (3 years) | $15.66M | $10.80M | $12.24M | | Implementation | $350K | $500K (migration) | $400K | | Training | $150K | $300K | $200K | | Ongoing Administration | $450K | $300K | $500K | | Compliance Configuration | $200K | $150K | $250K | | Total 3-Year TCO | $16.81M | $12.05M | $13.59M |

Important Caveat: These estimates assume the organization is already on the base platform. Migration costs from one ecosystem to another can dwarf the AI licensing costs and should be evaluated separately.

Integration Depth Analysis

Microsoft Copilot: Deep but Narrow

Strengths:

• Deepest integration with Microsoft 365 applications (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams)
• Native access to Microsoft Graph (richest enterprise data graph)
• Seamless integration with Dynamics 365 and Power Platform
• Copilot Studio for building custom agents within the Microsoft ecosystem
• Copilot agents for autonomous workflow automation

Limitations:

• Limited integration with non-Microsoft data sources (requires Graph connectors)
• No native integration with Salesforce, ServiceNow, Jira, or other non-Microsoft platforms
• Copilot's intelligence is bounded by what is in the Microsoft Graph
• Organizations with hybrid environments (Microsoft + Google + AWS) cannot leverage Copilot across all platforms

Google Gemini: Cloud-Native but Ecosystem-Bound

Strengths:

• Tight integration with Google Workspace applications
• Native connection to Google Cloud services (BigQuery, Vertex AI, Looker)
• NotebookLM for document analysis and understanding
• Gemini in Google Cloud Console for infrastructure management
• Strong developer tools integration (Gemini Code Assist)

Limitations:

• Limited integration with Microsoft Office applications
• Google Workspace market share is smaller than Microsoft 365 in enterprise
• Fewer third-party integrations than Microsoft's connector ecosystem
• Organizations with Microsoft dependencies cannot fully leverage Gemini

Amazon Q: Broad but Shallow

Strengths:

• 40+ connectors to enterprise data sources (Microsoft 365, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Jira, Confluence, and more)
• Data-source agnostic---can index and query across multiple platforms simultaneously
• Foundation model flexibility (choose Claude, Titan, or other models)
• Strongest for multi-platform environments where data lives across many systems
• Q Developer for code generation across IDEs

Limitations:

• No native productivity suite integration (does not embed in Word, Docs, or any editor)
• User experience is a separate chat interface, not integrated into daily workflow tools
• Requires AWS infrastructure expertise to deploy and maintain
• Connector setup and maintenance adds operational overhead

Decision Framework: Choosing the Right Platform

Choose Microsoft Copilot If:

• Your organization is standardized on Microsoft 365 (E3 or E5)
• You are in a highly regulated industry (healthcare, financial services, government)
• You need the deepest possible integration with Office applications
• Your security and compliance teams are already proficient with Microsoft Purview
• Meeting intelligence (Teams) is a high-priority use case
• You have existing Microsoft enterprise agreements with favorable licensing terms

Choose Google Gemini If:

• Your organization is standardized on Google Workspace
• You have significant Google Cloud investments (BigQuery, GKE, Vertex AI)
• Your workforce is primarily cloud-native and comfortable with Google tools
• Cost optimization is a primary concern (lower per-user cost at the suite level)
• You prioritize real-time collaboration capabilities
• Your industry compliance requirements are met by Google's certifications

Choose Amazon Q If:

• Your organization operates in a multi-platform environment (Microsoft + Salesforce + ServiceNow)
• You need to query across multiple enterprise data sources simultaneously
• You want foundation model flexibility (not locked into a single AI provider)
• Your organization has strong AWS expertise and infrastructure
• You prioritize data isolation and customer-controlled infrastructure
• You need an AI assistant for software development (Q Developer)

Consider a Multi-Platform Strategy If:

• Your organization has different business units on different platforms
• No single platform covers all your use cases
• You want to avoid vendor lock-in for AI capabilities
• You have the budget and expertise to manage multiple AI platforms

Strategic Recommendations

For Microsoft-Centric Enterprises

Deploy Microsoft Copilot as your primary enterprise AI assistant. Supplement with Amazon Q Business if you have significant non-Microsoft data sources that Copilot cannot reach through Graph connectors. Do not deploy Google Gemini unless you have a specific Google Workspace deployment.

For Google-Centric Organizations

Deploy Google Gemini for Workspace as your primary AI assistant. Consider Amazon Q Business for enterprise data sources outside Google's ecosystem. Do not deploy Microsoft Copilot unless you have a Microsoft 365 deployment.

For Multi-Platform Enterprises

Deploy Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365 users and Amazon Q Business as a cross-platform knowledge assistant. This provides deep integration where users work (Office apps) plus broad coverage across all enterprise data sources.

For Government Organizations

Microsoft Copilot in GCC High or Amazon Q in GovCloud provide the strongest compliance posture. Evaluate based on existing platform investments and specific compliance requirements (FedRAMP, ITAR, CJIS).

The Vendor Lock-In Reality

All three platforms create meaningful vendor lock-in. Microsoft Copilot locks you deeper into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. Google Gemini locks you into Google Workspace. Amazon Q locks you into AWS infrastructure. This is by design---each vendor wants AI to be the capability that makes switching costs prohibitive.

The most defensible strategy is to choose the platform that aligns with your existing investments and focus your AI governance framework on portability: structured data classification, platform-agnostic policies, and documentation practices that would survive a platform transition. The AI governance framework you build should be platform-independent even if your AI tools are not.

Next Steps

This comparison provides the strategic framework. Your procurement decision should also include a proof-of-concept with your actual data, a security assessment against your specific regulatory requirements, and a TCO analysis using your organization's actual licensing costs and implementation estimates.

If your organization needs help evaluating Microsoft Copilot against alternatives or building a platform-independent AI governance strategy, EPC Group provides vendor-neutral advisory services grounded in 25+ years of enterprise technology consulting. Contact us for a strategic AI assessment.

---

About the Author: Errin O'Connor is the founder and Chief AI Architect at EPC Group, a Microsoft Gold Partner with 25+ years of enterprise consulting experience. He has authored four Microsoft Press bestselling books and specializes in helping Fortune 500 organizations implement Microsoft Copilot securely and at scale.